{"id":17386,"date":"2017-03-16T05:00:19","date_gmt":"2017-03-16T12:00:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/?p=17386"},"modified":"2017-03-17T11:55:25","modified_gmt":"2017-03-17T18:55:25","slug":"executives-need-embrace-fake-data-software-testing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2017\/03\/16\/executives-need-embrace-fake-data-software-testing\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Executives Need to Embrace Fake Data in Software Testing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cThe value of an idea lies in the using of it,\u201d said Thomas Edison, yet the steps one must go through in order to move from concept to practice is where the true challenge lies. This is true in many areas of life. Scientists, like Edison, conduct experiments in laboratories, setting up idealized environments within which they can test their theories and inventions to ensure their functionality before putting them into real-world practice. Entrepreneurs are filled with inspiration for an idea, but then rigorously research, develop, and test the product or service to allow it to realize its full potential. This maxim also rings true for enterprises seeking innovation. And just as researchers and entrepreneurs test their ideas in labs where they sacrifice \u201creal life\u201d conditions for control and consistency before unleashing into the market, enterprises innovate using testing environments to ensure ideas have real value before adopting them.<\/p>\n<p>Enterprises have to take advantage of cutting-edge technology and new innovation to stay competitive\u2014which involves finding, testing, and implementing new solutions to further the overall business strategy. Despite the seemingly straightforward nature of the process, testing solutions in a lab-type setting is far from simple. Running a high level Proof-of-Concept (PoC) requires the creation of a testing environment fully stocked with data with which to carry out the test. But enterprises don\u2019t (and shouldn\u2019t) allow genuine data to be used in these tests, for a myriad of legal, security, or bureaucratic reasons, so fake data must be generated in order to represent the data that exists within the actual production environment.<\/p>\n<p>The idea of using fake data scares many company executives, and makes them skeptical of the process as a whole. If fake data is being used to test the new solution, how can a company know how it\u2019s truly going to work or scale properly when plugged into the actual production environment? After all, any researcher will tell you, gaps inevitably exist between fake and real data. Thankfully, there do exist technological solutions to make everyone sleep better at night. Deep Mirroring, for example, is the process of deeply analyzing and learning the configuration of a production environment, and creating a mirrored version of it, with structured and unstructured data, logic, APIs and all. Deep Mirroring enables creating a highly realistic yet entirely generated testing environment that maintains the crucial rules, relationships, and behavior that define the original.<\/p>\n<p>Faking data may sound as if all that\u2019s required is a good imagination, but creating and analyzing this data is a unique and complex process. Today&#8217;s systems are built mainly on top of open-sourced structured and unstructured Big Data clusters, which are replacing legacy RDBMS (relational database management systems). The storage and fetching queries Big Data requires are much more complex and are done through Map-Reduce processes or In-Memory queries, which creates additional complexities in learning and emulating the actual production environment. The result of faking highly realistic data is a testing environment that, while at first glance seems to be a real production environment, actually differs in the most important factor of all for enterprises operating with security and legal restrictions\u2014the data is not real.<\/p>\n<p>This highly sophisticated technology produces testing environments as close to \u201creal life\u201d conditions as feasibly possibly. The generated actions, structure, data, and interfaces make sure that no sensitive enterprise information is jeopardized. The behavior of the environment, on the other hand, provides the enterprise with the ability to fully understand the way a solution would act when integrated into its production environment. This allows for the most accurate and reliable testing to take place, second only to actually using the production environment.<\/p>\n<p>That being said, even with a highly realistic testing environment, the leap from lab to life is not one made lightly. As developers and enterprises conclude the PoC process, the many differences that de facto exist as a result of not being the actual production environment begin to appear more and more critical. As part of the attempt to ensure that the integration of a new solution won\u2019t be met with failure once in the production environment, various styles of predictive analysis can be deployed during the testing stages. New and constantly evolving predictive algorithms assess how a solution operates in the testing environment and predict how it will operate in the real production environment, removing doubts that come with taking that final step of integrating a solution. By testing the scalability of new solutions, adding or removing computing power, or just throwing various wrenches into the gears to test reactions and compatibility, enterprises can at least test some of the real world impediments that will be faced before the solution goes online.<\/p>\n<p>In today\u2019s competitive landscape, you have to use testing environments, labs of sorts, but instead of fearing them, embrace them. Recognize that using fake testing environments keeps the benefits of PoC testing without the risks. Utilizing all the tools at your disposal to make the test environments realistic and to foresee how the software will act after implementation, will allow you to take the reins of innovation. By using these technologies, you will be able to plan, find, test, and implement technologies, that were once just ideas, and lead your industry in innovation.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-17387\" src=\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/Alexey-Sapozhnikov.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"93\" height=\"116\" srcset=\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/Alexey-Sapozhnikov.png 198w, https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/Alexey-Sapozhnikov-120x150.png 120w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 93px) 100vw, 93px\" \/>Contributed by: Alexey Sapozhnikov, CTO and Co-Founder of <a href=\"http:\/\/proov.io\/\" target=\"_blank\">prooV<\/a>. Alexey is a career entrepreneur with over 20 years\u2019 experience in enterprise software and high tech management. His areas of expertise include Big Data, Cloud Computing, Data Science, Python, and Enterprise Architecture.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em>Sign up for the free insideBIGDATA\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/newsletter\/\" target=\"_blank\">newsletter<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In this contributed article, Alexey Sapozhnikov, CTO and Co-Founder of prooV  explores how ideas move from concept to product through various forms of testing. Just as scientists use laboratories, enterprises (in theory) generate test environments to evaluate the potential and compatibility of new technologies before implementing them. Executives understand the importance of using test environments to minimize security risks, but are understandably fearful of inaccurate results based on their experiences with fake data. With the introduction of Deep Mirroring and Predictive Analytics technologies for testing, fake data should no longer be a concern\u2014it should simply be embraced as a tool in the process of innovation. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10513,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[115,87,180,56,97,1],"tags":[552,96],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Why Executives Need to Embrace Fake Data in Software Testing - insideBIGDATA<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2017\/03\/16\/executives-need-embrace-fake-data-software-testing\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Why Executives Need to Embrace Fake Data in Software Testing - insideBIGDATA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In this contributed article, Alexey Sapozhnikov, CTO and Co-Founder of prooV explores how ideas move from concept to product through various forms of testing. Just as scientists use laboratories, enterprises (in theory) generate test environments to evaluate the potential and compatibility of new technologies before implementing them. Executives understand the importance of using test environments to minimize security risks, but are understandably fearful of inaccurate results based on their experiences with fake data. With the introduction of Deep Mirroring and Predictive Analytics technologies for testing, fake data should no longer be a concern\u2014it should simply be embraced as a tool in the process of innovation.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2017\/03\/16\/executives-need-embrace-fake-data-software-testing\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"insideBIGDATA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/insidebigdata\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-03-16T12:00:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-17T18:55:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/Alexey-Sapozhnikov.png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editorial Team\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@insideBigData\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@insideBigData\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editorial Team\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2017\/03\/16\/executives-need-embrace-fake-data-software-testing\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2017\/03\/16\/executives-need-embrace-fake-data-software-testing\/\",\"name\":\"Why Executives Need to Embrace Fake Data in Software Testing - insideBIGDATA\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-03-16T12:00:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-17T18:55:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/#\/schema\/person\/2949e412c144601cdbcc803bd234e1b9\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2017\/03\/16\/executives-need-embrace-fake-data-software-testing\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2017\/03\/16\/executives-need-embrace-fake-data-software-testing\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2017\/03\/16\/executives-need-embrace-fake-data-software-testing\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Why Executives Need to Embrace Fake Data in Software Testing\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/\",\"name\":\"insideBIGDATA\",\"description\":\"Your Source for AI, Data Science, Deep Learning &amp; Machine Learning Strategies\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/#\/schema\/person\/2949e412c144601cdbcc803bd234e1b9\",\"name\":\"Editorial Team\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e137ce7ea40e38bd4d25bb7860cfe3e4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e137ce7ea40e38bd4d25bb7860cfe3e4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editorial Team\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.insidebigdata.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/author\/editorial\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Why Executives Need to Embrace Fake Data in Software Testing - insideBIGDATA","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2017\/03\/16\/executives-need-embrace-fake-data-software-testing\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Why Executives Need to Embrace Fake Data in Software Testing - insideBIGDATA","og_description":"In this contributed article, Alexey Sapozhnikov, CTO and Co-Founder of prooV explores how ideas move from concept to product through various forms of testing. Just as scientists use laboratories, enterprises (in theory) generate test environments to evaluate the potential and compatibility of new technologies before implementing them. Executives understand the importance of using test environments to minimize security risks, but are understandably fearful of inaccurate results based on their experiences with fake data. With the introduction of Deep Mirroring and Predictive Analytics technologies for testing, fake data should no longer be a concern\u2014it should simply be embraced as a tool in the process of innovation.","og_url":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2017\/03\/16\/executives-need-embrace-fake-data-software-testing\/","og_site_name":"insideBIGDATA","article_publisher":"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/insidebigdata","article_published_time":"2017-03-16T12:00:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-17T18:55:25+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/Alexey-Sapozhnikov.png"}],"author":"Editorial Team","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@insideBigData","twitter_site":"@insideBigData","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editorial Team","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2017\/03\/16\/executives-need-embrace-fake-data-software-testing\/","url":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2017\/03\/16\/executives-need-embrace-fake-data-software-testing\/","name":"Why Executives Need to Embrace Fake Data in Software Testing - insideBIGDATA","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-03-16T12:00:19+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-17T18:55:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/#\/schema\/person\/2949e412c144601cdbcc803bd234e1b9"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2017\/03\/16\/executives-need-embrace-fake-data-software-testing\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2017\/03\/16\/executives-need-embrace-fake-data-software-testing\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2017\/03\/16\/executives-need-embrace-fake-data-software-testing\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Why Executives Need to Embrace Fake Data in Software Testing"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/","name":"insideBIGDATA","description":"Your Source for AI, Data Science, Deep Learning &amp; Machine Learning Strategies","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/#\/schema\/person\/2949e412c144601cdbcc803bd234e1b9","name":"Editorial Team","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e137ce7ea40e38bd4d25bb7860cfe3e4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e137ce7ea40e38bd4d25bb7860cfe3e4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editorial Team"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.insidebigdata.com"],"url":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/author\/editorial\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9eA3j-4wq","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":21159,"url":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2018\/09\/24\/3-ways-artificial-intelligence-improving-software-quality\/","url_meta":{"origin":17386,"position":0},"title":"3 Ways Artificial Intelligence is Improving Software Quality","date":"September 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"In this contributed article, Jon Seaton, Director of Data Science for Functionize, explores the use of AI in software testing and how it is already being applied in a variety of ways. Jon offers three important areas in which AI is making the most immediate impact.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;AI Deep Learning&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":25556,"url":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2021\/01\/27\/how-ai-and-machine-learning-will-shape-software-testing\/","url_meta":{"origin":17386,"position":1},"title":"How AI and Machine Learning Will Shape Software Testing","date":"January 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"In this special guest feature, Erik Fogg, Chief Operating Officer at ProdPerfect, covers some of the main benefits of adding AI to the software testing process, and why you should consider adding it to yours if you haven\u2019t already. ProdPerfect is an autonomous E2E regression testing solution which leverages data\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;AI Deep Learning&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/insidebigdata.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/erikfogg.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":10795,"url":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2015\/01\/17\/data-science-101-using-statistics-predict-ab-testing\/","url_meta":{"origin":17386,"position":2},"title":"Data Science 101: Using Statistics to Predict AB Testing","date":"January 17, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"The talk below presents simple methods that can accurately predict future performance from AB test results, and that allow you to determine the smallest acceptable sample size. Using four years of AB testing data, you'll see how these methods really work.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Data Science&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/insidebigdata.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/Slide1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":13951,"url":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2015\/10\/29\/new-bluedata-solution-accelerates-deployment-of-devtest-labs-for-big-data\/","url_meta":{"origin":17386,"position":3},"title":"New BlueData Solution Accelerates Deployment of Dev\/Test Labs for Big Data","date":"October 29, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"BlueData, provider of a leading infrastructure software platform for Big Data, today announced its Big Data Lab Accelerator solution, which includes the software and professional services required to deploy a ready-to-run Hadoop and Spark lab environment in just two weeks.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Big Data&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":30760,"url":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2022\/10\/28\/truera-launches-first-automated-test-harness-for-ml-models-with-truera-diagnostics-2-0-release\/","url_meta":{"origin":17386,"position":4},"title":"TruEra Launches First Automated Test Harness for ML Models with TruEra Diagnostics 2.0 Release","date":"October 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"TruEra, which provides a suite of AI Quality management solutions for managing model performance, explainability, and societal impact, launched TruEra Diagnostics 2.0, a major update to its TruEra Diagnostics solution, incorporating the first-ever automated test harness for AI models that includes root cause analysis. The new systematic testing features in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Big Data&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/insidebigdata.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/Machine_Learning_shutterstock_344688470.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":12613,"url":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/2015\/01\/15\/qubell-launhes-hadoop-self-service-test-environments-big-data-apps\/","url_meta":{"origin":17386,"position":5},"title":"Qubell Launches Hadoop Self-Service Test Environments for Big Data Apps","date":"January 15, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Qubell, provider of an autonomic application management platform for cloud applications, has announced the availability of Qubell for Hadoop Developers. The new solution enables Hadoop developers to add dynamic, cloud-based test environments on-demand for new or existing big data analytics projects.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Big Data&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17386"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10513"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17386"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17386\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17386"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17386"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insidebigdata.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}